top of page
Top of Posts Page
  • Writer's pictureHarriet

Oceanic Shark and Ray Populations Decline by 71%. Let's Dive In!

Updated: Feb 4, 2021

Many of us have seen the headlines and they are concerning, to say the least.

"71% population declines of oceanic shark and ray populations in the last half a century."

"77% of oceanic shark and ray populations are now threatened with extinction."

We’re referring to the paper published in Nature on 27th January titled 'Half a century of global decline in oceanic sharks and rays’. The paper analysed 31 oceanic shark and ray species total (hereafter referred to as sharks) using IUCN Red List data and Living Planet Index records spanning from 1970 - 2018. So, what did they find?

  • During the 50 year study period, it was noted that the largest species were effected first, followed by declines of consecutively smaller species.

  • The 77% threatened species refers to 24 of the 31 species classified as vulnerable, endangered or critically endangered on the IUCN Red List. The more typical statistic we hear is that a third of all shark and ray species are threatened but that refers to ALL species, not just oceanic species.

  • All but one of the 31 species showed declines in abundance, the exception was the smooth hammerhead (Sphyrna zygaena).

  • The Indian Ocean is the worst affected by population decimation, with declines of 84.7% reported.

  • Devil ray populations declined by 85% in some areas.

  • Sharks habituating tropical areas were worse affected than those in temperate areas.

  • These are said to be conservative estimates as UUI catches are not taken into account, and are prolific among shark and rays catches.

In the period of time the study assessed (1970-2018):

  • global fishing with longlines and seine nets, of which sharks are particularly susceptible, has doubled.

  • relative fishing pressure on shark and ray populations has increased 18-fold (relative fishing pressure refers to the exploitation of fish stocks relative to the number of fish left).

  • recorded shark and ray catches have tripled.

The cause of these declines?

As we have seen, shark populations are rapidly plummeting, but why? It may not come as a surprise to hear that fishing pressures have increased 18-fold since 1970. The authors suggest that it is due to this overexploitation of shark populations by the fishing industry that is to blame. Put simply, sharks are being killed at too high a pace, at too high an intensity, for reproductive output to keep up with, and thus their numbers sink lower and lower. After considereding maximum sustainable yields, IUCN’s listed threats for each species, and relative fishing pressures over time the authors came to the conclusion that...

"Strict prohibitions and precautionary science-based catch limits are urgently needed to avert population collapse."

In fact, on studying the Living Planet Index, they highlight that fishing pressures were already unsustainable even 50 years ago. If we are listening to scientists, can we truly be surprised by the results shown here? There is a ray of hope though. We know fishing restrictions and science based catch limits work in improving population numbers. Population stabilisation and subsequent increase in northwest Atlantic (NWA) hammerheads have been reported, owing to strictly enforced quotas throughout their US range. There is more good news for great whites and porbeagles too.

A paper released in 2014 assessed fishing legislation amongst other things in relation to abundance of white shark populations and found "growing evidence that legal protections for white sharks in the NWA and elsewhere around the world have been effective.” They went on to say "Population declines appear to have been halted and populations may now be stabilized or growing in several regions.” Porbeagle population stabilisation and potential growth due to effective fishing regulations being enforced has also been evidenced.

We know that enforcing and ensuring adherence to appropriate fishing regulations works.

Of the 31 assessed species, according to the IUCN every single species main threat was listed as ‘biological resource use’ specifically ‘fishing and harvesting aquatic resources’. It comes as no surprise that the worst affected areas, such as the Indian Ocean, are those with the fewest fishing regulations in place. The authors reemphasise that...

"strict measures to prohibit landings and minimize bycatch mortality ... are urgently needed to halt declines and rebuild populations.”

Of the 31 studied sharks, none were from coastal populations, leaving some speculating whether this decline can be extrapolated for all sharks. However, it was only in June 2020 that a study on the absent coastal populations was published, assessing the state of reef shark populations in 58 nations. MacNeil et al. state "Our results reveal the profound impact that fishing has had on reef shark populations: we observed no sharks on almost 20% of the surveyed reefs.” They went on to say... "closed areas, catch limits and an absence of gillnets and longlines were associated with a substantially higher relative abundance of reef sharks."

An increase in the global scale of fisheries since the previous mid-century delivers another devastating blow to the environment with the latest carbon reports. In the 1950’s, 47 million tonnes of CO2 were released by fishing vessels. By 2016, 207 million tonnes of CO2 were released into our atmosphere, with 48 million tonnes of that from small-scale fisheries. Whilst fishing pressures have doubled their carbon emissions have quadrupled. Read more on how sharks are intertwined in the climate crisis here.

We may sound like we’re opposed to fishermen and their communities but a crash in shark populations severely jeopardises food security for some of the world’s poorest countries. Local communities are forced to turn to increasingly destructive methods of fishing, are put out of work or forced into illegal work to feed their families. It is the effects of super trawlers and large fishing fleets that need to be addressed for everyones well-being. Pacoureau et al. state that "Alternative livelihood and income options are needed to ease transitions to sustainability."

Who can help and how?

Nathan Pacoureau, lead author and postdoctoral Fellow based at Simon Fraser University states...

"While we initially intended it as a useful report card, we now must hope it also serves as an urgent wake-up call.”

Our question is, when will governments and the fishing industry start listening? Shark conservation organisations, as well as scientists, have been shouting about this for years. As previously mentioned fishing estimates for sharks back in the 1970s was reported to be unsustainable and it has been evidenced endless times that governments routinely ignore sustainable catch limits for many fished species.

The Shark League say "Governments have fallen short in fulfilling their wildlife treaty obligations to protect threatened species and end unsustainable international trade in their parts”. The Finspire Change UK campaign and Stop Finning EU citizen initiative are currently trying to end the trade of fins throughout the UK and the EU. Please encourage your governments to support these initiatives, you have the power to influence change.

We can turn things around and the papers discussed here provide us with a firm foundation for which governments simply cannot ignore any longer. Let this be the pivotal paper that changes the future for these incredible species. Let us implement a sense of urgency with our calls to action, encouraging MPs, politicians and governments to create and enforce better fully protective legislation so that these species are not lost forever.

If you liked this, you might also like these:


bottom of page